Create accountLogin

Recent searches

No recent searches

Search options

Not available on esq.social.
esq.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance for legal professionals and folks in law-adjacent fields. We abide by the Mastodon Server Covenant, available (here)[https://joinmastodon.org/covenant].

Administered by:

Server stats:

80
active users

esq.social: AboutProfiles directoryPrivacy policy

Mastodon: AboutGet the appKeyboard shortcutsView source codev4.3.4

Anthony (he/him)

Stuff happening over on the is almost too on-the-nose bad to believe it’s not intentional. Feels like we are days away from the announcement that ONLY hate speech will be allowed (for example). But I can’t come up with a good explanation for why the intent would be to force the thing to collapse.

Dec 15, 2022, 03:03 AM·Public·Mastodon for iOS
0boosts·2favorites
Public
Jacob Schumer

@anthony I personally think he not attempting to save the company from bankruptcy and is willing to be reckless with its management because he hates this, and the sooner he can divest himself from the company, the more he can preserve his reputation by blaming prior management. He is a narcissist and his ability to maintain an identity of being an ultra competent genius is way more important than a few billion dollars.

Public
Andrew Leahey

@anthony I think rampant incompetence can sometimes masquerade as intent. It's the reason reckless is closer to intentional than it is negligent.

Public
CyberDean07 ✅

@anthony @andrew “Reckless disregard for the truth” contemplates failure of one to exercise due diligence, a display of imprudence, or lack of foresight which is bordering more on intentional than simply being negligent

Public
CyberDean07 ✅

@anthony @andrew More than being deliberate or intentional, there appears to be an agenda, overt or covert, governing the takeover of the platform from across the digital pond

ExploreLive feeds
About